085/100 - War Videos

some comments from YouTube.Com:

1. yes this is true of most sites, but if you go to the "Engagement" section of www.coanews.org you'll see many postive stories - again COA News is not the mainstream media - it's quite the opposite.

This issue is in fact a serious issue we should be worried about - if the telco's can they will turn the net into a tiered network, otherwise they would not pay millions to avoid the net Neutrality law, in fact they spent millions removing it from FCC law - go www.savetheinternet.com
2. Has anyone thought if the sheep will be lulled by security from their children seeing porn.

OK. Porn's not my life. heh. But alot of the blind might be convinced to shut of access to much of the bad content their children might see.

This may sound negative but it's going to be the outcome 99.9% of the time if you were God doing lab IMHO. Welcome to the true underground revolution. Time has come where you obey or you don't. And in the end that's the only drawn line. Exhilirating.
3. i bet if things got so restricted, people would refuse to pay for it.its all supply and demand.i blog because i can right now just for paying my internet fees, but if they up the fees then i'll stop and the service providers will lose more money than they profit from the people who get suckered into paying more, therefore going bankrupt unless they drop the fees. if cokes cost $5 instead of 50 cents, then i stop drinking coke. same thing. it's all an idea, but will it ever come to fruition, nah.
4. Also this seems to be way way over exaggerated. It is something internet companies are doing to make it so they are top dogs. It isn't like they control all of the webpages opened. They just make it so we use different search engines and such. I think that shouldn't be if they aren't the ones responsible for the internet. They just are bribed to make it so companies don't succeed as well. That is messed up but not a dictatorship. It is just taking what is not theirs. It should be a free choice.
5. "Old school" telecomm is so central to society that it is a regulated utility ... while run on a capitalist financial model, certain services are guaranteed by law, to prevent the stifling of thought in a "town commons." The same utility model should now apply to the Internet.

However, it seems only fair to charge more to someone who uses the town commons more than others. But penalizing people for their REASON for using it should be prohibited by law.

some comments from YouTube.Com:

1. thats a pretty well done clip man ..props...

some comments from YouTube.Com:

1. COPY, PASTE, AND PASS IT ON

The Cheney-Specter Bill (S. 2453) will make warrantless domestic spying permanently legal!

Bill Includes warrantless eavesdropping of all communications, and the data mining and profiling of every U.S. citizen.

If war is declared, warrantless searches of all homes and businesses will be legal.

The legal concept of "probable cause" will be eliminated from the Constitution.

Call and fax your Senators, and tell them "NO" on S. 2453.

WWW.BORDC.ORG

2. COPY, PASTE, AND PASS IT ON

The Cheney-Specter Bill (S. 2453) will make warrantless domestic spying permanently legal!

The legal standard of "probable cause" will be erased from the Constitution.

Bill Includes warrantless eavesdropping of all communications, and the data mining and profiling of every U.S citizen.

If war is declared, warrantless searches of all homes and businesses will be legal.

Call and fax your Senators, and tell them "NO" on S. 2453.

WWW.BORDC.ORG

3. I made $348 from this site last month


U get money for filling out surveys usually $1 around each There r also free trials for more
than $10 each D surveys r REALLY EASY AND TAKE JUST COUPLE MINUTES Each month they send u a check to the mail (no credit card) This site is 100% legit U can check the forums for proof of payment Its just a good way to make some cash


http://linkki.info/3w3ww


Questions? Ask me

PROOF check it pls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h645sL_0YA&

4. have you ever heard of the saying

correlation does not equal causation?

just because we havent been atacked doesnt mean bush is preventing it. bush is about as involved as a newscaster is on the news he's reporting.

the simple fact is, 98% of what comes into this country doesnt even get inspected. if a terrorist wanted to get a dirty bomb in, they wouldnt have a problem.

the only real defense we have is the human element. counterintelligence, spys w/in terrorist organizations. black-ops.

5. Hefeweisen,
from your link:
"assuming that that had all been adopted say on January 26th, year 2001, is there the remotest chance that it would have prevented 9/11?
CLARKE: No."
With the clarity that 20/20 hindsight provides, it's very easy to condemn a bit of complacency.When coupled with the attempts at rendering Bush's election illegitimate, the knee-jerk stonewalling of Bush's cabinet picks.. it appears the Democrats share some culpability for the inability to focus on REAL problems?

some comments from YouTube.Com:

1. Best Infantry in the world, kill the enemy AND hearts& minds. keep up the good work lads.

2. good old iraqi police we should use them as shields instead.

3. Well put together, and informative. Thanks for posting.

4. go para's, fucking kick some taliban ass!!!!!!!!!!

some comments from YouTube.Com:

1. Certainly not. The weapon was the good old RPG-7, simple but deadly. Maybe not so effective against fish though.

2. one rpg one catfish,, not fair heh.they should put some cordite into it then youll get fishloads heh!

3. Is it American arm? I seem it captured Taribans' rocket.
Anyone Firearm freak?

4. lmao...no supply drop for them i take it...

5. what !! 1 bazzuka for 1 fish. XD

some comments from YouTube.Com:

1. I love this video, freakin hilarious. I was lucky enough to see the sights, splendor and stank of that piece of shit town. I was even lucky enough to have a car bomb explode while we were trying to take the fucker apart. Ahhh, what great memories of that dank, nasty shit hole.